<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>sembuilders &#187; Search Engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sembuilders.com/tag/search-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sembuilders.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 03:13:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>LinkFarms and the WHY NOT</title>
		<link>http://www.sembuilders.com/2008/05/linkfarms-and-the-why-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sembuilders.com/2008/05/linkfarms-and-the-why-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 12:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google pagerank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkfarms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website promotion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sembuilders.com/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is a link farm? A link farm is any website designed and set up for the sole purpose of getting search engine spiders to crawl and index web pages. These websites provide absolutely no end user utility or benefit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; float: right;">
<p>Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:PageRanks-Example.svg" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a></p>
</div>
<p><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:PageRanks-Example.svg" target="_blank"><img style="border: medium none; display: block;" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fb/PageRanks-Example.svg/202px-PageRanks-Example.svg.png" alt="Numeric examples of PageRanks in a small system." /></a></p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: 12px;"><span style="font-size: 14px;"><strong>Link Farms</strong></span></span></span></p>
<p>What is a link farm? A link farm is any website designed and set up for the sole purpose of  getting search engine spiders to crawl and index web pages. These websites provide absolutely  no end user utility or benefit.</p>
<p>So how do you recognize a link farm? First, you need to ask yourself, is this site heavy laden  with links? Most link farms will have a &#8220;farm&#8221; of links with little to no content. As for an  explanation of the site&#8217;s existence, it&#8217;s usually missing too.</p>
<p>The next question you need to ask is, what does the URL of the site itself look like? Most of  the time, link farms will have long, hyphenated URLs (i.e. our-great-linking- directory dot com).  This is a generalization so not all link farms will have these types of URLs. Many of these  link farms are generated using software. The software will go out and find a domain name that  contains specific keywords even if it settles on something with several hyphens and numbers.  You may still consider a long, hyphenated site for linking purposes but make certain you conduct  more research before you submit a link.</p>
<p>Next, look at the domain name extension and note if it&#8217;s .ínfo or .bíz. In order to sell these  extensions, many domain name registrars provide a one-time, deep discount. I know of several  registrars that sell .ínfo domains for 89 cents per year. These cheap domain names allow  sp@mmers to generate thousands of sites at a huge discount.</p>
<p>The next criteria I use to help identify a link farm is what I call the &#8220;cheese factor&#8221;.  Although some link farms will look professionally designed, most are either <strong>1)</strong> generated  with software or <strong>2)</strong> are designed with the same cookie-cutter, non-altered templates that  fill search engine results. This is especially true with blogs. Sp@mmers and Internet newbies  will not take the time to brand their websites or blogs. These are commonly referred to as &#8220;pump  and dump&#8221; websites.</p>
<p>Another question you should ask is, does it look human? That is, does it look like someone hangs  around and takes care of things? You should also be able to contact the webmaster either via web  form or e-mail. If there&#8217;s no contact information available anywhere on the website, be very afraid.</p>
<p><span><span style="font-size: 12px;"> If it&#8217;s a directory site, check out the links in a few of the main directory headings. Are the  URLs hyphenated just like the main URL? If you visit one of these sites, does it look the same  as the site you just came from? Are there more URLs crammed onto one page than anyone could  possibly visit in a lifetime?</span></span></p>
<p>Last but not least, if you have your suspicions that a site might be a link farm, for any reason,  stay away. It&#8217;s better to miss a great linking opportuníty than to post your link and get downgraded  in your search engine placements.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;"><strong>Non-relevant Links</strong></span></p>
<p>When you&#8217;re placing your links, you want to make sure that the site you&#8217;re linking to has  something to do with your site and, vice versa.</p>
<p>A non-relevant link is defined as a hypertext link placed on a website, or in a directory, that  has little to no relevance to the linking site or directory. These links are placed for the sole  purpose of <strong>1)</strong> increasing page rank or <strong>2)</strong> getting a website crawled and indexed or  a combination of the two.</p>
<p>The most obvious way to combat not-relevant links, over which you have complete control, is the  placement of links on your site. Avoid placing links on your site to another that has no  relevance to your content; even if it&#8217;s legitimate. Why? The link doesn&#8217;t do anything for you or  the person whose link you placed. On the other hand, don&#8217;t ask someone to place a link on their  site which doesn&#8217;t relate to yours.</p>
<p>Google, Yahoo, and MSN all look closely at whom you&#8217;re linking to and who&#8217;s linking to you. In  fact, Google&#8217;s PageRank definition specifically states that link relevance (quality) is looked  at more than just the link itself.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s the solution? As in researching a potential link farm, you need to check out the sites  that you&#8217;re linking to. If you&#8217;re submitting your site to directoríes or article directories, make  sure that you&#8217;re submitting your content and links to the most relevant topics and sections.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry about getting an exact match in terms of relevance between your site and the linking  site; just make sure that each site complements the other.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;"><strong>Know the Linking Pitfalls</strong></span></p>
<p>In summary, you can be accused of being a link sp@mmer even if you think you haven&#8217;t done anything  wrong. To keep your linking strategy clean, I&#8217;ve outlined two specific techniques that will keep  your site safe with the search engines.</p>
<p>First, watch out for unscrupulous link directories and sites (i.e. link farms). Use the techniques  and ask yourself the questions I&#8217;ve outlined to recognize and avoid these harmful sites.</p>
<p>Second, make sure you&#8217;re posting to relevant sites/directories/ articles/ blogs or wherever you  choose to submit your content and links.</p>
<p>Most importantly, if you think you might get accused of being a sp@mmer, by attempting to use a  linking technique you just read about or software you just bought, trust your gut and don&#8217;t do it.  Linking software creators claim that you can get thousands of back links with the press of a button  or for only &#8220;$49&#8243;. The only way to get good quality back links is to do the research yourself and  hand-submit every single link.</p>
<p>If you avoid these two traps, you&#8217;ll be well on your way to getting the links you need to get your  website placed higher in search results and, as a result, generate more sales.</p>
<p>This was published by LinkAquire.com in a newsletter sent to users in 2008.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12px;"> </span></p>
<div id="zemanta-pixie" style="margin: 5px 0pt; width: 100%;"><a id="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><br />
</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sembuilders.com/2008/05/linkfarms-and-the-why-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO SEM companies VS google Advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.sembuilders.com/2008/05/seo-sem-companies-vs-google-advertising-part-i/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sembuilders.com/2008/05/seo-sem-companies-vs-google-advertising-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[search  business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sembuilders.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the increased offer of online business optimization companies,  search engine marketing and optimization consultants, studios, agencies and firms, it seems no surprise that the same "creators" of the services that started this keyword battle...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the increased offer of online business optimization companies,  search engine marketing and optimization consultants, studios, agencies and firms, it seems no surprise that the same &#8220;creators&#8221; of the services that started this keyword battle, would open doors to offer their OWN services combo towards services in the search business. YES this is real&#8230;<a href="http://http//www.google.com/ads/overview.html" target="_blank">Google</a> now offers their own services including keyword investigation, website submission and visibility, etc. In a commercial basis, and with rates far from what small business can afford.  The question here would be&#8230;does that includes the actual MSN, YAHOO competition? We are no stupid and know that a commercial &#8220;solution&#8221; or &#8220;option&#8221; is always offered at least in the major search companies mentioned in this article, but would this be a honest competition among search business consultors? We thinkg this is something that only SERPS and conversion results will define.</p>
<fieldset class="zemanta-related" style="margin: 0.5em 0pt 1em; padding: 0pt;">
<legend class="zemanta-title">Related articles</legend>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul" style="margin: 1em 0pt 1.5em; padding: 0pt;">
<li class="zemanta-article" style="margin: 0.5em 2em;"><a title="Open in new window" href="http://jeremyhermanns.org/me/top-5-non-seo-ways-to-increase-your-search-rankings-search-engine-watch/" target="_blank">Top 5 Non-SEO Ways to Increase Your Search Rankings &#8211; Search Engine Watch</a> [via Zemanta]</li>
</ul>
</fieldset>
<div id="zemanta-pixie" style="margin: 5px 0pt; width: 100%;"><a id="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img id="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixie.png?x-id=ffe85c22-b189-4be0-a1cc-7b4b9f655d88" alt="" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sembuilders.com/2008/05/seo-sem-companies-vs-google-advertising-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
